By Tim Shipman

|


Stricter rules: The plans should make it far more difficult for children to access inappropriate websites on family computers

Stricter rules: The plans should make it far more difficult for children to access inappropriate websites on family computers

David Cameron is to toughen up controls on internet pornography to protect children.

In future, anyone buying a new computer or signing up with a new internet service provider will be asked whether they have children when they log on for the first time.

Those answering 'yes' will automatically be taken through the process of installing anti-pornography filters and a series of questions about how stringent they want restrictions to be.

That will allow parents to impose timed access limits on lewd material, or prevent children viewing social networking sites such as Facebook during certain hours of the day.

Ministers will also demand that internet service providers impose 'appropriate measures' to ensure that those setting the parental controls are over 18.

And they will be told to prompt existing customers to install porn blocking technology.

The proposals, due to be announced by the Government later this month, go much further than a blueprint drawn up by Reg Bailey, the head of the Mothers' Union, who was commissioned by the Government to suggest new curbs.

His plan would simply have seen parents given an 'active choice' to opt in or out of porn controls. But under the Prime Minister's plans, those with children will be automatically guided through the process of installing the filters.

The move marks a significant step forward for the Daily Mail's Block Online Porn campaign, which has called for the introduction of content filtering systems for internet accounts.

Mr Cameron has rejected calls for an automatic block on porn, which adults would have to actively opt out of, after experts advised that parents needed to play an 'active role' in installing filters so they are fully informed about the technology.

The Government plans to tell service providers that they must impose the new controls or face legislation.

Changes: Mr Cameron has rejected calls for an automatic block on porn, but new rules will focus on installing filters so parents are fully informed about the technology

Changes: Mr Cameron has rejected calls for an automatic block on porn, but new rules will focus on installing filters so parents are fully informed about the technology

His aides believe they will fall into line because they have already introduced Mr Bailey's 'active choice' proposals.

Children now start to use the web at the age of eight. As many as one in three under-tens have seen pornography on the web, while four out of five children aged 14 to 16 admit regularly accessing explicit images on their home computers.

Half of children say they use the internet alone in their bedroom, making it difficult for parents to effectively monitor their activity.

A senior No10 source said: 'We know lots of parents are concerned about the material their children are accessing on the internet and we want to do more to help. We've consulted on a variety of options on how we can make it safer for children online.

'Internet service providers have made great progress to date in implementing "active choice" controls, as recommended by Reg Bailey, where all users are asked if they want to switch on parental controls.

'After intervention from the Prime Minister, the Government is urging providers to go one step further and make sure their systems actively encourage parents, whether they are new or existing customers, to switch on parental controls.'

TalkTalk, which provides a HomeSafe porn blocker to its customers, welcomed the plans.

Chief executive Dido Harding said: 'We have been asking all our new customers if they want to turn on HomeSafe, the only parental control service that protects every device using the home internet connection, since the beginning of the year and our experience shows it really works.

'One in three new customers – roughly the proportion of households in the UK with dependent children in them – are choosing to turn parental controls on and 80 per cent think being asked is a good thing.'

The comments below have been moderated in advance.

And so Daft Dave staggers from one disaster to another...

Tell you what Dave, "The Government plans to tell service providers that they must impose the new controls or face legislation." How about it reading ....."The Government plans to tell all coffee providers (starbucks), internet (google) providers that they must pay tax or face legislation." Or ... "The Government plans to tell all millionaires with off shore accounts that they must pay tax or face legislation" sorry thought not!

Keep hammering the nails in your political coffin Dave. You are fast becoming the worst Prime Minister this country has ever had. There will be a day when all of your failings of the country and its people come back to haunt you. And that day is not very far away. You can then sit and remember all the promises you made before the election and all those you have broken since. That and the lack of guts, plus your utter disregard for the working class people's needs are your downfall. All this moving bands not once but twice is a nice little earner for the Government yet again while the people of this country suffer the upheaval of it all.

For years ive been waiting to watch porn for free. Now i can, the government want to stop me. What next? Stopping my weekly visits to the brothel?

Daves had another idea, well thats not gonna work then either! Vitually every new bright idea of this man has turns out a disaster, why not combine them into one, a mayor/police/porn supremo!

DM what do you mean by porn? I only ask because you have made a habit of posting naked pictures of women on your sight. I wonder if your sight would get blocked.

Online censorship isn't a good idea. Yes, let's follow in China's shadow with that idea. NO! It's the parents responsibility, whether you like porn or not, it is someone's profession. You would be destroying small businesses and careers, as I mentioned whether you like it or not.

This so isn't what the government should be worrying about!

Dear DM this isn't a victory for your block online porn campaign. This looks more like an opt-out system to me than the "block by default" system you lot have been pushing. This is a victory for common sense and I'm glad you haven't actually had your way; so please stop pretending you have!

Why are so many people on this post ranting about nanny states etc.? It's KIDS we are talking about here, not teens full of hormones. Kids who are forced to grow up at an earlier and earlier age. Porn should NOT be coming at them day and night. How can the same readers who ranted about 'peado' adults over the last few weeks then argue about letting kids watch porn? Isn't that called grooming??????

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.