By Daniel Martin

Last updated at 2:07 PM on 24th August 2011


Their decisions to stop what most regard as harmless fun have annoyed and baffled the public in equal measure.

These, however, are the cream of health and safety killjoys.

A list of the top ten most infuriating bans by Britain's busybodies has been released.

Too risky: Officials ruled that sack races on school sports days should be banned because competitors could fall and hurt themselves (Library photo)

Too risky: Officials ruled that sack races on school sports days should be banned because competitors could fall and hurt themselves (Library photo)

Among the daft decisions was one to stop dodgem cars bumping into each other at Butlins holiday parks.

The top ten also included stopping daytrippers from flying kites on beaches and banning sack races on sport days.

Even the Royal British Legion made the list for not giving out pins to attach poppies, lest supporters prick themselves.

Wimbledon bosses featured for barring fans from watching tennis on Murray Mount after rain, in case they slipped.

The list was released by the Health and Safety Executive, which said too many middle managers were taking it upon themselves to ban low-risk activities. Many of the cases uncovered in the last year were first highlighted by the Daily Mail.

Ministers have ordered a wide-ranging review and pledged to  consolidate or simplify the law.

Epidemic of excuses: Chris Grayling

Epidemic of excuses: Chris Grayling

Employment minister Chris Grayling, whose brief covers the issue, said: 'We have seen an epidemic of excuses wrongly citing health and safety to prevent pretty harmless things with only very minor risks attached. This has to stop. Health and safety laws should not hamper everyday activities.

'These regulations are intended to save lives, not stop them.'

In reality, health and safety legislation is mostly aimed at the workplace, dealing with risks such as unguarded machinery.

Butlins banned bumping on dodgems at its resorts at Skegness, Minehead and Bognor Regis in April over fears of being sued, despite complaints it made the rides boring. At the time, Jeremy Pardey, director at Bognor Regis, cited 'health and safety reasons', saying: 'The point of our dodgems is to dodge people, not to run into people.'

Other baffling bans on the list included councils stopping Royal Wedding street parties and carnivals being told not to have fancy dress parades.

Schools in Oxfordshire stopped pupils using playground monkey bars unsupervised while a school in Merseyside banned leather footballs. Malvern Primary School allowed children to play football only if they were made of sponge.

East Riding Council said it would fine kite-flyers up to 500 on a series of beaches including Bridlington and Hornsea. In June, Colchester Council told Charlotte Cubitt, 85, staff could not take her TV to be recycled as they might hurt themselves.



 

Here's what readers have had to say so far. Why not add your thoughts below, or debate this issue live on our message boards.

The comments below have not been moderated.

Let us know the names of all of the proposers of Health & safety laws. Perhaps their I.Q.s might even help. - Roseglen21, Benfleet, 24/8/2011 18:22****H&S legislation like all other laws are the responsibility of Government. The role of the HSE is to provide guidance and when necessary conduct investigation. The problem is the interpretation of that guidance by employers etc. If you go to the HSE's own website you will see that many of the examples quoted by the DM are listed under "H&S Myths". This is just more lazy journalism - something the DM is becoming infamous for.

And every single one is a lie. It is funny how the DM makes things up and it's gullible little readers are just stupid enough to accept without question. What a bunch of sheep. - Phil, Sussex, 24/8/2011 16:16 Someone`s lying Phil and I say it`s you. A quick Internet search of Butlins Dodgems for example brings up several sources of Jeremy Pardey`s decision. A bit of research next time hey Phil there`s a good boy.

Let us know the names of all of the proposers of Health & safety laws. Perhaps their I.Q.s might even help.

The trouble is not so much the H&S law but the fear of being sued! It's cheaper for places to ban things than pay out if someone does have an accident. I remember laughing at comedians who made jokes about safety labels on American products in case they were sued. Now we seem to be worse this side of the Atlantic. Allowing solicitors to advertise on TV was one of the worse decisions ever made as it has encouraged people to claim for every minor injury rather than accepting a certain level of risk as part of being alive.

There is a simple but very effective way to stop these No Win-No Fee ambulance chasing lawyers in their tracks, and bring the whole compensation industry crashing down. All the government needs do, is to pass a law forcing said lawyers to pay 90% tax on these type of cases. The remainders goes to whoever brought the case. Work out what the loopholes are likely to be and plug 'em. The compensation industry would disapear almost overnight. But of course, that is too simplistic for any government is'nt it?

"Elf & Safety" ........so 70's (maybe even 1870's) and not very funny.

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.