By Jonathan Petre

Last updated at 4:42 PM on 20th November 2011


Prince Philip has launched an outspoken attack on wind farms, branding them 'absolutely useless'.

In comments that put him sharply at odds with the Government, the Prince reportedly said the farms were a 'disgrace' and they would never work.

He also described people who backed them as believing in a 'fairy tale'.

Outburst: Prince Philip reportedly said that wind farms were a disgrace and they would never work

Outburst: Prince Philip reportedly said that wind farms were a disgrace and they would never work

The Prince's views will be welcomed by critics who say the wind turbines, which can be up to 300ft tall, are noisy, spoil the countryside and drive up energy bills.

But the Government is determined to increase the proportion of electricity produced by the turbines as part of its environmentally friendly energy policies.

Energy Secretary Chris Huhne last month denounced opponents of the plans as 'curmudgeons and fault-finders' and praised the turbines as 'elegant' and 'beautiful'.

There are currently 3,421 turbines in Britain – 2,941 of them onshore. A further 4,500 are planned over the next few years. The Prince is said to have voiced his views in a private conversation with an executive for a leading wind farm company at a recent reception in London.

According to today's Sunday Telegraph, he told Esbjorn Wilmar, managing director of Infinergy, a firm that builds and operates turbines, that they were over-reliant on subsidies.

The newspaper quoted Mr Wilmar as saying: 'He said they were absolutely useless, completely reliant on subsidies and an absolute disgrace. He said, "You don't believe in fairy tales, do you?"

Flawed: To cover up the ineffectiveness of wind farms the Government will be forced to build emergency back-up power plants, the cost of which will be paid by industry and consumers

Flawed: There are 3,421 wind turbines in Britain but they have been criticised for driving up energy bills

'He said that they would never work as they need back-up capacity. I was surprised by his very frank views.'

It was disclosed last year that electricity customers are paying an average of 90 a year to subsidise wind farms along with other forms of renewable energy and energy efficiency schemes as part of a Government scheme to meet carbon-reduction targets.

Mr Wilmar said one of the main reasons the Duke thought onshore wind farms to be 'a very bad idea' was their reliance on such subsidies.

The financial incentives being offered to green energy developers have led landowners – including the Duke of Gloucester, the Queen's cousin – to look to build wind farms on their estates.

Prince Philip said he would never consider allowing his land to be used for turbines and complained about their impact on the countryside.

Mr Wilmar said: 'He said he thought that they're not nice at all for the landscape.'

The Duke's comments echo the views of his son Prince Charles, who has refused to have any built on his Duchy of Cornwall land.

However, while they are opposed to onshore wind farms, the Royal Family stands to earn millions of pounds from those placed offshore.

Last year, the Crown Estate, the 7?billion land and property portfolio, approved an increase in the number of sites around the coast of England.

The Crown Estate owns almost all of the seabed off Britain's 7,700-mile coastline.

Experts predict the growth in offshore wind farms could be worth 250?million a year.

Buckingham Palace said it did not comment on private conversations.

Here's what readers have had to say so far. Why not add your thoughts below, or debate this issue live on our message boards.

The comments below have not been moderated.

Totally agree with you Phil!

This man has no qualifications to express an informed opinion on this topic any more than you do. I'm sorry if this sounds harsh but you clearly have not investigated this in any depth. If I am wrong in this please inform us of your sources. - Ben, Rugby, 20/11/2011 17:38........................................................Prince Philip is as "qualified" as any of the various politicians who are pushing these and surcharging our current bills to subsidise them. From en engineering/scientific persoective they will NEVER be able to provide enough energy to be viable/practical. Economically the are not viable without huge subsidies, and from an environmental perspective they require so much concrete to me manufactured the net effect on the environment is seriously damaging.

Better wind farms than oil spills in the oceans, awareness b4 money!

He's RIGHT! It takes MORE carbon to make them than they save; wind is variable, and the damn things are more NOT in use than they are! As for Phil and Liz Windsor being 'useless' - as a Republican, even I know that without them, this country will be in a WORSE state than we are currently in, with this useless, unelected/mandated, pro-EU, anti-British Public opinion (despite the fact that they are OUR employees) government...

I am against political propaganda dressed up as climate 'science'. - Martin, Lutterworth, Leicestershire, 20/11/2011 17:19 ============= Which you haven't read much of. And the bits you did read you didn't understand (those nasty constants, eh Marty?). And you don't even know what it is scientists claim about the IR physics surrounding CO2! All straight from your own keyboard! So how can you possibly feel remotely qualified to pass an opinion on this subject? Hubris is the answer, pure and simple.

first time he has got anything right

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.